Return to Modules

Module 3 Activity - Discuss Topic Session Components

Objective: Discuss the relationship between the Stages of Change Model and Social Cognitive Theory.

Instructors: Karen Williams

Directions:

1. Read the following from the internet site listed below:

Pajares F. Overview of Social Cognitive Theory and of Self-Efficacy. At: http://www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/eff.html

2. Working with your Small group:

1) Discuss and identify how can you integrate concepts from the Stages of Change Model of health behavior and Social Cognitive Theory into program planning on your topic for individuals with SPMI.

2) In what ways are the two models consistent?

3. Go to the Discussion

Evaluation Criteria

Task of assigned group leaders: Facilitate discussion and post which model of health behavior your group has collectively chosen, and three specific strategies on how you plan to integrate concepts from Social Cognitive Theory into program planning for your final project.

Evaluation of Discussion on Models of Individual Health Behavior within the context of Social Cognitive Theory Points
Points

Discussion involves advantages and disadvantages of different theories as they relate to the selected session topic.

7 = Comparison of advantages and disadvantages of different theories lead to group consensus on selected theory.
3 = Lacks appropriate comparison of advantages and disadvantages in choice of selected theory.
0 = Failure to discuss advantages and disadvantages.

7

Justification of selected theory is logical and appropriate.

7 = Discussion has separate component justifying and summarizing choice of selected theory.
3 = Justification is embedded within discussion but not explicit.
0 = Lack of justification of selected theory.

7

Discussion demonstrates the group has integrated their selected individual model of health behavior and Social Cognitive Theory into program planning on your topic for individuals with SPMI?

7 = Components of the two theories are clearly related to social support in individuals with schizophrenia.
3 =Components of the theory are related to social support but not with individuals with schizophrenia.
0 = No link of components to social support.

7

Gives specific examples of how session topic can utilize information on
community/social support in program planning specific to the target
population.

7 = Examples of community/social support strategies are appropriate for target population.
3 = Examples of community/social support strategies may not be appropriate for target population.
0 = Fails to understand unique community/social support issues in individuals with SPMI.

7

Group consensus statement is clearly written with few editing errors.

7 = Group consensus statement is clearly written with few editing errors.
3 = Group consensus statement contains few editing and spelling errors.
0 = Group consensus statement is poorly written.

7
TOTAL 35

Return to Modules